ImplementedIndependent institution: no party creditIn office at the time:Narendra Modi, coalition governmentUnsettled

Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls

ECI ordered a house-to-house rebuild of Bihar's roll on 24 June 2025 and extended it to other States; the Supreme Court upheld it on 27 May 2026 while limiting the ECI's citizenship inquiry; West Bengal appeals continue.

Electoral rolls

Facts

  • On 24 June 2025 the Election Commission of India ordered a Special Intensive Revision of the Bihar roll, with 1 July 2025 as the qualifying date; the roll then held about 7.89 crore electors [1][4].
  • Bihar's draft roll of 1 August 2025 had about 7.24 crore electors (about 65 lakh omitted); the final roll of 30 September 2025 had about 7.42 crore, after 3.66 lakh removals and 21.53 lakh additions at the claims stage [3].
  • On 27 October 2025 the ECI announced Phase 2 for 12 States and Union Territories covering about 51 crore electors; Phase 3 (16 States and 3 UTs, about 36.73 crore electors) was announced on 14 May 2026, with final-roll dates later revised in several States, e.g. Karnataka and Delhi to 27 October 2026 [5][6].
  • On 8 September 2025 the Supreme Court directed that Aadhaar be accepted as proof of identity in the Bihar SIR, not as proof of citizenship; on 27 May 2026 it upheld the SIR under Article 324 and section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, distinguishing it from ordinary revision under section 21(2) read with rule 25 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 [2][11][17][18].
  • Proceedings on West Bengal voters' appeals against deletion continue; the Supreme Court listed them for hearing on 16 October 2026 [7].

Why

Reasons given by those who did it

  • The ECI said the revision aims to include the names of all eligible citizens and exclude ineligible entries, with transparency in additions and deletions [4].
  • Union Home Minister Amit Shah (BJP) said the SIR is needed to remove infiltrators from the rolls and would 'detect, delete and deport infiltrators' (Lok Sabha, 10 December 2025) [12]; the Union Government told the Rajya Sabha that the SIR followed due process of law without prejudice to any group or community (reply dated 30 July, as reported) [13].
  • The ECI told the Supreme Court that draft-roll publication, claims, objections and appeals protect eligible voters, and that the petitioners' fears were speculative [1].

Criticism of that reasoning

  • Petitioners including ADR, PUCL and MPs from the INC, RJD and AITC argued that the document requirements and timing risked excluding eligible voters and that the ECI cannot decide citizenship [1][2].
  • NDA constituent TDP asked the ECI (15 July 2025) to state that the SIR is not related to citizenship verification and to allow more lead time; JD(U) MP Giridhari Yadav called the process a 'Tughlaqi farman' as a personal view [14][15].
  • DMK president M. K. Stalin called the SIR 'a conspiracy by ECI' (27 October 2025); West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee (AITC) called it 'chaotic, coercive and dangerous' (20 November 2025); BJP leaders rejected both objections [16][17].
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi alleged 'vote chori'; the CEC asked him for an affidavit or an apology [8].

Benefits and concerns

Benefits (2)

  • The revision rebuilt rolls from house-to-house enumeration and removed entries recorded as dead, shifted or duplicate.Bihar draft omissions of about 65 lakh, mainly categorised by the ECI as dead, shifted or duplicate; 21.53 lakh eligible electors added at the claims stage [3].
  • Court-directed safeguards widened access to the process.Supreme Court orders to publish omitted names with reasons (14 Aug 2025), accept Aadhaar for identity (8 Sep 2025), and keep claims open to the nomination deadline [2].

Concerns (2)

  • Large deletions and disputed classification of cases in West Bengal.Reported 90.82 lakh names removed up to April 2026, including 27.16 lakh under adjudication; 93% of appeals decided by tribunals so far were allowed (as reported 9 Oct 2026) [7][9].
  • BLO workload and reported deaths, and the document burden compared with 2003.A petition by TVK alleged 35-40 BLO deaths (unverified); the Court asked states to supply more staff. The ECI said 2003 listed four indicative documents and 2025 listed eleven [4][10].

Evidence points

Independent institution: no party credit. This was decided by Election Commission of India, not by a party government. It is scored on the same rubric and shown here, but its points are not added to or subtracted from any party's total. The government in office at the time is shown for context only. Why.

+4.5
points, mean of two scorers (scale −25 to +25)
+4 to +5
range between the two scorers' totals
Low confidence
scorers agree within 1 point on every criterion
ReachHow many people did the action materially affect?
Mean +2.5A +2B +3
Outcome evidenceDo official or independent data show the intended result (or its opposite), compared with the era baseline and peers?
Mean 0.0A 0B 0
Cost and sustainabilityIs the fiscal cost proportionate, and is the effect durable?
Mean 0.0A 0B 0
Process and rightsWas it made with debate, consultation and legal soundness, and did it respect rights and court rulings?
Mean +0.5A +1B 0
DeliveryWas it implemented as announced, on time and at scale?
Mean +1.5A +2B +1

Positive meanNegative meanScorer AScorer B

Scorer A. Court upheld the exercise and limited its citizenship inquiry, but large deletions, disputed classification and pending West Bengal appeals leave outcome evidence mixed.

Scorer B. Rolls were rebuilt for hundreds of millions of electors, but large deletions, disputed West Bengal appeals and a Court that upheld it while limiting citizenship inquiry leave outcomes mixed.

Context used when scoring

Era baseline
Before 2025 the last intensive revision in Bihar was in 2003; rolls were otherwise updated by annual summary revisions, with the ECI's 2003 order listing four indicative documents.
Lag before outcomes show
1 year
Shocks considered
bihar-assembly-election-2025, supreme-court-interim-orders-2025
Uncertainty
Low confidence. Scorer totals are +5 and +4. How uncertainty is shown.

In depth

The SIR is an exercise ordered by the Election Commission, an independent constitutional body, so it carries no party credit here (government in office: NDA, centre-2024-modi-3). Stated purposes, figures by stage and the contested claims are set out in the dossier “Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls”.

The Supreme Court upheld the exercise on 27 May 2026 while holding that the ECI’s citizenship inquiry is limited to roll eligibility and that doubtful-citizenship cases go to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act. The text of the 27 May 2026 judgment and the 8 September 2025 order was opened [17][18]; the ECI orders were not (official sites returned errors), so figures and ECI statements come from secondary reports and should be checked against the primary documents. Whether deletions affected any election result is not established.

Sources

Last reviewed .Report an error orchallenge a score.

Dossiers on this topic

Fact files that share a sub-category with this action. They are not scored.

  • TopicOngoing

    Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls

    The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, begun in Bihar in June 2025 and extended state by state, with figures, court rulings, party positions and disputed claims as of 12 October 2026.

    Facts as of

Related actions

  • ImplementedBJPElections & DemocracyUnsettled

    Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023

    Parliament legislated appointments of election commissioners; the panel is the PM, the Leader of Opposition and a Union Cabinet Minister, replacing the Chief Justice named in the Court's 2023 interim panel.

    Evidence points +0.5 (range −1.0 to +2.0)

  • Struck downBJPElections & Democracy

    Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018

    Bearer-type bonds sold by SBI from 2018 let donors fund registered parties without public disclosure of donor names; the Supreme Court struck the scheme down on 15 February 2024.

    Evidence points −8.5 (range −10.0 to −7.0)

  • Struck downBJPElections & Democracy

    Candidate Disclosure Ordinance and RPA (Third Amendment) Act, 2002

    After the Supreme Court ordered candidate affidavits on cases, assets and education, an ordinance and Act narrowed disclosure to criminal cases; the Court struck down Section 33B in 2003.

    Evidence points −3.0 (range −5.0 to −1.0)

  • StalledJDElections & Democracy

    Women's Reservation Bill, first introduction 1996 (81st Amendment Bill)

    The United Front government introduced the first Constitution amendment bill to reserve one-third of Lok Sabha and Assembly seats for women in September 1996; it was referred to a joint committee and lapsed.

    Evidence points −2.0 (range −3.0 to −1.0)